To: kingattax
Obama is more electable than Clinton so there is more danger of a Democrat president if he is nominated.
However, Clinton would be a more dangerous president than Obama would be.
The Clintons have done this ebfore and they will have learned from their mistakes: it will take twenty years or more to undo the damage they will do in their first month's hirings and firings alone.
59 posted on
02/12/2008 11:06:28 AM PST by
wideawake
(Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
To: wideawake
However, Clinton would be a more dangerous president than Obama would be.
Rush is reading some Obama quotes from a recent interview...the man is clueless on presidential powers, the courts, etc. Rush is offering McCain gifts on how he can beat this guy.
68 posted on
02/12/2008 11:18:12 AM PST by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson