Posted on 02/11/2008 11:19:02 AM PST by pabianice
Heard this afternoon on Rush's show, in response to a caller's question: 'Obama may get the most delegates, but he won't be the Democrat nominee. We're talking about the Clintons here.'
Just after you listen to a speech by Obama go to utube and listen to an old speech Hitler made in the 1920s and early 30s before he became Chancellor — they are pretty much the same emotionalist and issueless drivel directed at the same type of collectivist mentality.
Also, read up on his racist background — his conflict with having a white mother that led him into a black racist church. I believe Obama like Hitler is a raving anti-Semite. Why? Obama knows he cannot directly attack the whites or Christinity for the simple reason they are the majority in the country.
However, the Jews are not so fortunate — They are a minority in this country and hated by millions of their fellowmen, especially in the black community — and like the Jews in Germany offer a potential dictator a target to unite both black and white racists.
Never forget that Hitler came to power by legal means and united the country around Anti-Semitism.
But can we Republicans regroup after Obama becomes President? Obama could declare martial law and ban the GOP.
The German Republicans believed they could regroup after Hitler became Chancellor in 1933 — but guess what? Hitler had the German Parliament to pass “The Enabling Act” that banned all the opposition parties to the Nazis. Chavez did the same thing when he became the legal President of his country.
Why not Obama?
Point well taken
Dole/Kemp II right off the cliff into the Viagra abyss!!!
I’m talking about the super delegates...generally old time Dem hacks with LONG records of ethical issues.
We are. And nothing seems to generate paranoia around here quite like Clinton, Inc.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1969030/posts
Amnesty is back in light of the Amnesty Mccain, Amnesty Clinton, and Amnesty Obama one of the three will will fact of life.
thx for the ping, LTM.
I believe with a Dem in office, the Rs and many Ds can be convinced to vote against amnesty, just as many did with the last 3 or 4 amnesty bills. However, with McCain in there, the Rs will follow him over the cliff (just as the Republican-controlled Senate did with SB 2611, McCain-Kennedy).
I think our best chance is with a Dem in the WH and with lots of conservatives in Congress (of either party, any more).
Even if people are too disgusted to vote for McCain, PLEASE remember to vote for your congressmen! They are even more crucial since a liberal will be in the WH, no matter who wins.
“Your ridiculous conspiracy mongering is getting tiresome. “Corruption,” my ass.”
I don’t doubt that your ass is corrupt. And so is the Republican Party. Not as corrupt as the demonrats, but still plenty corrupt enough to distort the process of picking candidates.
Your ridiculous naivete is annoying.
Uh, Rush also stated that hillary would not be a Senator from New York.
He also stated that Bill wouldn't win in 1992 and that he'd never get re-elected in 1996.
I love Rush, but he can't accurately make a prediction about the Clintons to save his life.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.