i am not in favor of the ban. i am not against the ban. oh, what s the use? you evidently need to post 6 times in a row to get your point across.
We understand, the smell of smoke is icky and yucky to you. I understand why you would be glad they banned it.
Just as long as you understand that they didn’t do it because you or anyone else was annoyed. There’s a lot more to it than that.
“i am not in favor of the ban. i am not against the ban. oh, what s the use? you evidently need to post 6 times in a row to get your point across.”
I find it funny that you celebrate the ban and defend the ban, then state that you have no opinion. How is it possible to be so obtuse and hypocritical? My guess would be that you lack a thought out principle with regards to property rights, therefore it is easier to waffle in these discussions.
Keep in mind that the tools are being used here, will continue to be used against the righteous. Don’t think that it is to much of a stretch to consider the Bible to be hate speech. It offends some members of society, therefore their freedom to not be offended, a tool created in the smoking on private property issue, will be used to prosecute individuals preaching that hate speech.