Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zebrahead
Romney would have gone NOWHERE without his money.

What does the source of the money have to do with anything? He could have spent voters money instead although I don't see that the source should matter.

Nevertheless, when Romney stepped aside he had more wins and more delegates than anyone except McCain.

In fact, he had more than Huckabee and all the other candidates added together.

As for Jeb Bush..... He is just as big a pandering RINO and open border advovcate as his brother and John McCain - maybe bigger.

95 posted on 02/09/2008 3:44:48 PM PST by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: Iron Munro

Romney did NOT “step aside”. He suspended his campaign.

Those who know Romney know he is deceitful to get what
he want, and this pseudo-”step aside” only occurred because
Romney was LOSING. Romney does not want voters’ votes to
count and this is yet another way.


102 posted on 02/09/2008 3:51:39 PM PST by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: Iron Munro

He outspent the entire field combined. That is what really matters. I know Romney also raised a bunch. But he spent a staggering amount of money between his own wealth and the money he raised for only a small percentage of delegates. It is not an accomplishment.


108 posted on 02/09/2008 3:59:10 PM PST by zebrahead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson