Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tantiboh

Yes, he was first choice for some folks. If he hadn’t put 35+ million of his own money in to get the delegates he did, he’d be the first choice of scant few.

Money can get you votes and recognition. What it can’t do is erase your record.


224 posted on 02/10/2008 9:18:59 AM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]


To: pissant

~”Money can get you votes and recognition. What it can’t do is erase your record.”~

No, money can get you recognition. Romney needed that, given he was running against household names.

Money does not get you votes. Forbes is testament to that. The reason Romney built up so much support - about 30% of the Republican base - is that many people were attracted to his ideas.

The charge by some people that Romney was trying to buy the election is childish. What he bought was exposure. Evidently, he didn’t do enough to earn the votes.


237 posted on 02/10/2008 5:16:17 PM PST by tantiboh (Don't blame me. I supported Romney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

I had barely heard of Romney 6 months ago. Now that I have become familiar with his campaign, it is obvious to me he is twice as intelligent as any other candidate running.

But the way I am looking at it, people get the government they deserve. So we might end up with Billary or Obamination. Selfishly speaking, it is good that most voting population is not very smart. It sure makes it easier to out-compete them.


252 posted on 02/10/2008 9:15:06 PM PST by ajay_kumar (United we win, divided democrats win. How difficult is that to understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson