[ansel12]

It would sure be nice if one of you guys that know how to do ping lists and such, would start a ping list to defend Ronald Reagan.

It looks like the anti Reagan efforts are not going away.

[restornu]

Oh go take your flea powder you are starting ot make everyone itch!

[Reagan Man]

I’ve been defending Reagan for many years, going back to the 1970`s, against falsehoods, half-truths, obfuscations and outright fabrications. Been battling the anti-Reaganites on FR going on 9 years now. Its a never ending process. Thankfully many of Reagan’s most ardent detractors have moved on from FR. Educating the ignorant and correcting historic revisionists is a significant task, but well worth the effort.

Thanks for your help in defending Reagan.

[ejonesie22]

They are just trying to bend Reagan to fit Romney, a man who once rejected the same.

Like the “adamantly pro choice” bit which is an extreme distortion of Reagan’s position since it implies advocacy of the pro choice position, they take “Reaganism" and fit it to Mitt’s flaws. They are so in love with him and you can read in their posts that logic is right out.

Sad that they want to take a flawed candidate and try again in 4 years. Mitt Romney will never win the nomination unless he is the only one running and he will never turn out enough of the stanch conservatives and those who are leery of his religion to put him over the top in a General Election. His defeats in this run have proved that. Despite out spending everyone he still lost to Candidates that a man of his resumed statute should have eaten for lunch.

As far as his sycophants here and else where trying to make him the heir to Reagan, I can't decide if it is more comical or disgusting.