McPain is now in the role of Goldwater after CA in 1964, and Huckabee is in the role of the liberal Scranton (who is still very liberal as I understand it). Yet people keep saying how “conservative” PA is or “could be”. It never happens.
Yes he is. His entire campaign and strategy has been to non Repubs which has worked beautifully for him. But these voters won't be there for him in Nov and he is so arrogant I'm not sure he knows that yet.
It is also understandable that people are upset since there is a previous Repub platform and when that is thrown away, it takes a while to digest.
My focus is that we have two candidates running in the presidential race for the GOP, and Mike Huckabee is far better than John McCain. So, I will do all that I can to support Huckabee.
Huckabee is strongly pro-life, and strong about protecting our 2nd amendment rights:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1967535/posts
A week ago, I called Dr. Richard Land’s radio show to say that not only did Senator McCain support human embryonic stem cell research, but according to the late Congressman Henry Hyde, John McCain wanted to WEAKEN the pro-life plank of the Republican Party platform, so he is different behind the scenes, than the picture he tries to portray to us.
Here’s where I got my information from:
“Hyde, who has criticized McCain for advocating weakening of the Republican Party’s pro-life platform plank.
Pro-abortion leaders also see a big difference. Following McCain’s win in the New Hampshire primary, the Republican Pro-Choice Coalition said that based on exit polls, “pro-choice Republicans overwhelmingly preferred McCain above all the other candidates.”’
excerpt from: http://www.peopleforlife.org/mccainthreatensprolife.html
And here’s why Duncan Hunter endorsed Huckabee out of the remaining candidates:
http://issuesthatmatter.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/hunter-endorses-huckabee/#comment-276