No, but he WAS the candidate with the most conservative record that had a chance to win. At least, he is strongly conservative on many issues and could be trusted to nominate judges.
What you don't want to admit, apparently, is that Romney raised taxes/fees more than Huckabee per year, implemented socialized health care that is costing that state hundreds of millions of dollars per year and presided over an awful economy in that state. Yes, Huckabee's economic record was far better than Willard's, too.
Huckabee is a WORSE candidate than even the RINO McCain.
Worse on taxes, worse on crime, no better on immigration.
And clueless on foreign policy, to the point of being another Jimmy Carter.
Huckabee is awful, God-awful. Why do keep polishing a turd?
He’s got 15% of delegates and WILL NOT WIN. Give. It. Up.
“What you don’t want to admit, apparently, is that Romney raised taxes/fees more than Huckabee per year”
Why would someone admit to a Huckabee lie/distortion?
Romney was fiscal conservative, Huckster was a tax-and-spend liberal:
http://taxhikemike.org