Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: j_k_l

en. John McCain (R-Ariz.), a longtime critic of pork spending, has introduced S. Res. 173, intended to make it easier to weed out earmarks in appropriations bills that are unauthorized or not requested by the president. Co-sponsoring the bill are Senators Russell Feingold (D-Wis.), Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), and Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) If passed, the resolution would help restrain out-of-control spending by requiring 60 votes to retain an earmark if a senator raised a point of order against it.

Earmarking is often used by legislators to “bring home the bacon” to benefit their district or state even if the spending may not be necessary. Sen. McCain has long contended that most special projects inserted into annual appropriations bills are both wasteful and partial to legislators’ political motives.

By CAGW’s count, earmarks have increased by 346%, from 2,100 in 1998, to 9,362 in 2003. A resolution designed to question the objectivity of unauthorized appropriations is imperative as wasteful spending and pork barreling practices increase every year. Special projects spending has risen by 70 percent since 1998, from $13.2 billion to $22.5 billion in fiscal 2003.
http://www.cagw.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=7007


62 posted on 02/07/2008 7:45:09 AM PST by TinaJeannes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: All

http://www.taxpayer.net/TCS/letterstocongress/2007-03-28senatesuppamendments.html


65 posted on 02/07/2008 7:48:18 AM PST by TinaJeannes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: TinaJeannes
McCain was "For Earmarks before he was against them." [His pal John Kerry should be proud].

In February 2006, McCain teamed up with fellow Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl on a bill to direct $10 million over five years to help create the William H. Rehnquist Center at the University of Arizona Law School.

I guess some politicians are "more equal than others".
68 posted on 02/07/2008 8:04:00 AM PST by j_k_l
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: TinaJeannes
24 hours and waiting...

All you have come up with is that he is against Earmarks.

I asked you to show me ONE bill that he sponsored that proposed cutting the size of government. Being against Earmarks is hardly being for reducing the size of current government programs.

Need more time?
113 posted on 02/08/2008 6:47:21 AM PST by j_k_l
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson