Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MARTIAL MONK

Well it’s like if Democrats nominated Leiberman because he was electable, a moderate, nop, not happening, only one side picks the guy who loves the other side’s ideas and it isnt the rats.


43 posted on 02/06/2008 9:11:09 AM PST by sickoflibs (Are libs really as dumb as they act??(maybe they just assume we are that dumb))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: sickoflibs
Here's Hillary's record. Notice how it matches up exactly with McCain's.

HILLARY'S VOTING RECORD

2007: 100 percent
2006: 100 percent
2005: 100 percent
2004: 100 percent
2003: 100 percent
2002: 100 percent
2001: Because only one choice-related vote was taken in 2001 – to confirm John Ashcroft as United States Attorney General – no numerical score was given for the year. Sen. Clinton voted pro-choice.

We really need Hillary to win, don't we. John McCain is a bad, bad man.

49 posted on 02/06/2008 9:21:56 AM PST by MARTIAL MONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson