You think the guy who has done the worst of anyone in state after state except for a mere handful of small primary rural states can win a General Election? The guy with the smallest delegate count should be considered the front runner?
Huckabee has no money, an incredibly weak political organization, has made screwy statement after screwy statement that National Media would use to eat me live in a General Election. You think Mr "The US should apologize to Pakistant because a terrorist assinated Bhutto" has the campaign skills to win a nation wide election?
Just how much have you had to drink today?
Politics is not a sporting event where you pick a team and mindlessly cheer for it no matter how bad it stinks.
Did you tell that to all the Fredheads and Duncan people? Huckabee is the NY Giants of politics. Given the opportunity he can succeed. He has proved that time and again. His Iowa victory was huge. And he is facing MSM religious bigotry every step of the way. This guy is a remarkable retail politician and if he had had the name recognition of McCain and the money of Romney he would have run away with this nomination by now. I didn't just pick Huckabee out of the blue. Ideologically, I would be a Paul supporter, but since conservatives don't know a conservative when they see one and Paul didn't stand a chance I sought out a guy that had a chance against Clinton. Only Huckabee fit that bill. McCain will be toasted by Clinton. Too old. Too hawkish. Too unstable. Romney is the wrong kind of man for this particular election. Fred was a dud. Duncan who? One issue Tancredo? Huckabee was the whole package. Great speaker, strong social conservative, not too doctrinaire on other issues, willing to play hard ball.....yeah....he is the guy. He could compete with Clinton. So I really didn't eeny meeny miny moe him. There was some logic to my choice.....in fact a lot more logic than most other people apply.