Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC reports Romney canceling scheduled campaign events for later in week

Posted on 02/05/2008 9:31:52 PM PST by mngran2

Just reported on tv. Also said Romney to meet at campaign headquarters tomorrow to have "frank discussion" about future of campaign.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; loser; presidenthildabeast; romney; supertuesday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 681 next last
To: WOSG

McCain really creeps me out. Creep factor and needing a transfusion yesterday is front runner Juan McCain. He’s as big a liar as Bill Clinton but with McCain you can actually tell when he’s lying.


501 posted on 02/05/2008 11:58:33 PM PST by floriduh voter (TERRI'S DAY MARCH 31, 2008 ...JUAN MCCAIN IS A THREAT TO SOVEREIGNTY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]

To: ellery

“So why in the world are you blaming Romney’s failures on us???”

PS. Romney won 7 states today so I’d call it partial SUCCESS, not failure.

The real failure is not Romney, he is a successful man who has run a very good campaign which got close to winning, but probably not quite.

I WILL STILL SUPPORT HIM AND VOTE FOR HIM NO MATTER WHAT.

The real failure is with the conservative base, which failed to come to a single unifying candidate to stop McCain.

OUR failure to rally to Romney is OUR LOSS, not his.


502 posted on 02/05/2008 11:59:11 PM PST by WOSG ( better a convert than a traitor - Another Conservative for Mitt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Wow, you ARE creepy with that money-hangup.
like I said: It speaks more about you than him.


503 posted on 02/06/2008 12:01:09 AM PST by WOSG ( better a convert than a traitor - Another Conservative for Mitt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Rig your election back. Start now, and walk precincts for your Senator. When you find someone who cares also, get them to walk some streets, too.

Keep track of who is supportive and double check they are going to the polls before election by phoning them or revisiting them if their phone number is not on the election rolls.

At least, I hope you in some way try to make a difference.

504 posted on 02/06/2008 12:02:17 AM PST by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1562436/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: truthguy

So, the nxt president will be creepy. Won’t that be swell? A leftist creep for four year while they print the new money and open up all the superhighways for foreign truckers. It’s more than Mexican truckers.


505 posted on 02/06/2008 12:03:51 AM PST by floriduh voter (TERRI'S DAY MARCH 31, 2008 ...JUAN MCCAIN IS A THREAT TO SOVEREIGNTY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: LordBridey

“I agree. I have nothing against Romney. He would probably make a fine president. He certainly has the background that would recommend him to the position. On paper, he looks amazingly good.”

Yes, he would have made the best President of any of the candidates.

“But there is obviously something that people can’t embrace.”

Let no overanalyze this - Romney got MORE VOTES THAN Huckabee, Rudy, Thompson, Hunter... so what’s wrong with Huck and the rest?

” Perhaps it is telling that no other former candidate has endorsed him.”

Not really. I take Judge Robert Bork and GOv Matt Blunt and Senator Jim DeMint endorsement over RINO Rudy any day.


506 posted on 02/06/2008 12:04:06 AM PST by WOSG ( better a convert than a traitor - Another Conservative for Mitt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

What so bad about being sucessful? Romney has earned his money if you check his background. He did not marry his money like the pig McCain or the gigolo John Kerry. You sound like the ignorant populist Huckabee.


507 posted on 02/06/2008 12:05:20 AM PST by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: Tramonto
Why bother?

Why should we care if Mr "National Smoking Ban moral obligation to take care of illegal immigrants children, the US should apologize to Pakistan for Bhutto getting killed by a Muslim terrorist " Huckabee gets the nomination or if Mr "Close Gitmo, give legal protection to terrorists, hike the Gas Tax $.50 to pay for more bureaucrats to fight the mythical man made global warming, close buddy of Ted Kennedy" McCain wins?

A Liberal is a Liberal no matter what party label you slap on them.

508 posted on 02/06/2008 12:05:34 AM PST by MNJohnnie (So in November, is it going to be our Liberal or their Liberal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
The only thing that separated us was that each side concluded that the other candidate couldn't be trusted.

Thanks for your positive comments. I largely agree with what you said except that in many cases, we have been separated by our ordering of priorities as well as by mistrust of either candidate.

509 posted on 02/06/2008 12:05:49 AM PST by Theophilus (Nothing can make Americans safer than to stop aborting them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

You missed the point of course, without being born into his wealth and church, he appears to be empty.

Do you know that he never even played sports? This empty suit never left the nest of his birth, there are no chapters and adventures in his life, he is as he was born, and now he is sixty, and he will always be in the bubble.


510 posted on 02/06/2008 12:06:57 AM PST by ansel12 (The conservative boat sailed long ago, it is every man for himself now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

To: LordBridey
I believe that Tancredo endorsed Romney.

Romney was new to national politics. He had no chits to turn in.

If he does the rounds and raises money for Republican candidates after the 2008 debacle, he can earn those chits.

But as much as I wanted to believe in the man, and as much as I think he actually has come to care about the country at his core, I am not positive about that. So, I don't know.

I would bank more on Romney than on Huckabee, but I wouldn't bet my house on either of them.

511 posted on 02/06/2008 12:07:07 AM PST by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1562436/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
What do we gain by fighting this to the Convention?

It is simple, if we do not fight this to the convention we will certainly lose. If we do fight this to the convention we will probably lose. It is better to probably lose than to certainly lose.

512 posted on 02/06/2008 12:08:26 AM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (Mike Huckabee: If Gomer Pyle and Hugo Chavez had a love child this is who it would be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller
Take it up with the American people.

No, you should.

Try actually looking at even a shred of data instead of thinking your emotion based opinions are facts.

The GOP has consistently moved to the Left since 2002. What has happened to their political power in Congress? What has happened to their party member numbers? Donations? Political approval numbers? Dropped like a stone in a bottomless well.

The culmination of this tread will be John McCain's butt kicking landslide lost to the Dems in Nov 2008. You all decided Bush 70% Conservatism wasn't moderate enough so your are running to move the Party 35% more to the Left with McCain.

Go see how well that sells to the American Voters.

513 posted on 02/06/2008 12:13:02 AM PST by MNJohnnie (So in November, is it going to be our Liberal or their Liberal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]

To: All
If you have friends who voted for the petty, arrogant, mean, nasty, vindictive, self-rightous, vicious McCain slap them upside the face the next time you get the chance. If not for your own sanity then for their own good.
514 posted on 02/06/2008 12:13:56 AM PST by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 512 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Well, briefly, if the current way isn’t working, and there’s nothing to lose, then try something else. But more lengthily:

The establishment GOP is completely out of touch with all of us, which is one reason that they keep pushing candidates and ideas that are anathema to big chunks of the party.

I believe the reason they have lost touch with us is that they have gotten complacent — they push a candidate and expect that we will just go along. They hear us complain, and they say “yeah, yeah, they always complain, but they’ll do what we say in the end.”

A brokered convention is one proof that we are not going to obediently unite behind the candidate that the GOP establishment has chosen for us. There hasn’t been a brokered convention in many decades — if anyone in the GOP is paying attention, they will see it for what it is: a huge flashing red light that we’re not just falling in line anymore.

Sure, short-term they’ll still get their candidate (probably McCain). If that candidate then loses in November, that will be another huge flashing red light. After that, they’ll either re-evaluate what kinds of candidates they’re pushing/grooming/supporting, or they won’t. If they don’t, then my guess is that they’ll continue their slide into irrelevancy as a party for conservatives.

I certainly wouldn’t bet on the GOP seeing the flashing red lights. But as we have nothing to lose, let’s give it a shot and see what happens.


515 posted on 02/06/2008 12:14:33 AM PST by ellery (In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock -T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl
“Interesting that Romney is winning ALL the caucuses. Seems the informed voters make a different decision than the sheeple except WV where mccain/hackabee colluded”

Thats right. The caucuses where whoever pays the most to bus in supporters and offers them free pizza to stand in a corner like trained moron seals wins.

Romney and Rooty were never viable candidates in the Republican party and the Rocky-Fellers better get that through their thick skulls.

516 posted on 02/06/2008 12:17:13 AM PST by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

“With a what looks like a landslide victory in November for a Clinton/Obama victory, you can stick a fork in the USA.

You can kiss victory in Iraq and Afghanistan goodbye. Al Qaeda will look upon the Democratic landslide as their victory.”

A new POTUS will be tested by Al Qaeda.

We will be mostly done in Iraq by years end and I think some troops will be moved to Afghanistan. What will happen after that I don’t know.


517 posted on 02/06/2008 12:17:14 AM PST by Goldwater and Gingrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: pissant
No not for me, I can't throw up and vote at the same time.

This is all so sad, No Hunter, No Fred and maybe no Romney. Next No America as we know it.

518 posted on 02/06/2008 12:18:16 AM PST by Brandie (This Fredhead Will NEVER Vote McCain or Huck the hick! Please Vote for Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Politics is not a sporting event where you pick a team and mindlessly cheer for it no matter how bad it stinks.

Did you tell that to all the Fredheads and Duncan people? Huckabee is the NY Giants of politics. Given the opportunity he can succeed. He has proved that time and again. His Iowa victory was huge. And he is facing MSM religious bigotry every step of the way. This guy is a remarkable retail politician and if he had had the name recognition of McCain and the money of Romney he would have run away with this nomination by now. I didn't just pick Huckabee out of the blue. Ideologically, I would be a Paul supporter, but since conservatives don't know a conservative when they see one and Paul didn't stand a chance I sought out a guy that had a chance against Clinton. Only Huckabee fit that bill. McCain will be toasted by Clinton. Too old. Too hawkish. Too unstable. Romney is the wrong kind of man for this particular election. Fred was a dud. Duncan who? One issue Tancredo? Huckabee was the whole package. Great speaker, strong social conservative, not too doctrinaire on other issues, willing to play hard ball.....yeah....he is the guy. He could compete with Clinton. So I really didn't eeny meeny miny moe him. There was some logic to my choice.....in fact a lot more logic than most other people apply.

519 posted on 02/06/2008 12:18:29 AM PST by LordBridey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies]

To: LordBridey

“Watch for Huckabee to continue to roll up victories in Louisiana and Texas”

Texas will never in a million years go to Huck.

Thanks for helping put McInsane in the drivers seat.


520 posted on 02/06/2008 12:21:55 AM PST by Goldwater and Gingrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 681 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson