Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Real Scandal-How Feds Invited the Mortgage Mess
New York Post ^ | February 5, 2008 | STAN LIEBOWITZ

Posted on 02/05/2008 5:42:47 AM PST by OESY

...From the current hand-wringing, you'd think that the banks came up with the idea of looser underwriting standards on their own, with regulators just asleep on the job. In fact, it was the regulators who relaxed these standards- at the behest of community groups and "progressive" political forces.

In the 1980s, groups such as the activists at ACORN began pushing charges of "redlining"- claims that banks discriminated against minorities in mortgage lending. In 1989, sympathetic members of Congress got the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act amended to force banks to collect racial data on mortgage applicants....

In fact, minority mortgage applications were rejected more frequently than other applications- but the overwhelming reason wasn't racial discrimination, but simply that minorities tend to have weaker finances.

Yet a "landmark" 1992 study from the Boston Fed concluded that mortgage-lending discrimination was systemic....

No sooner had the ink dried on its discrimination study than the Boston Fed, clearly speaking for the entire Fed, produced a manual for mortgage lenders stating that: "discrimination may be observed when a lender's underwriting policies contain arbitrary or outdated criteria that effectively disqualify many urban or lower-income minority applicants."

Some of these "outdated" criteria included the size of the mortgage payment relative to income, credit history, savings history and income verification. Instead, the Boston Fed ruled that participation in a credit-counseling program should be taken as evidence of an applicant's ability to manage debt....

Banks that got poor reviews were punished; some saw their merger plans frustrated; others faced direct legal challenges by the Justice Department....

These days, everyone claims to favor strong lending standards. What about all those self-righteous newspapers, politicians and regulators who were intent on loosening lending standards?

As you might expect, they are now self-righteously blaming those, such as Countrywide, who did what they were told.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: acorn; bailout; countrywide; cra; keatingfive; mortgagecrisis; subprimelending; subprimeloans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last


Emily Litella: "These subprime loans are a problem for the economy. Congress must do something."

Jane Curtin: "Who do you think caused the problem in the first place - on Clinton's watch, I might add?"

Emily Litella: "Oh... never mind. Maybe Clinton and Congress have to chill out this time."

.

1 posted on 02/05/2008 5:42:50 AM PST by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OESY

Bump for later reading.


2 posted on 02/05/2008 5:44:36 AM PST by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

It’s discrimination when you don’t lend to the poor minority borrowers, it’s also discrimination when you do.


3 posted on 02/05/2008 5:46:06 AM PST by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

“As you might expect, they are now self-righteously blaming those, such as Countrywide, who did what they were told.”

Agreed.....expected.
another Lawyer welfare program brought to you by the Democrat ‘party’!


4 posted on 02/05/2008 5:46:50 AM PST by CRBDeuce (an armed society is a polite society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

This is right on the money. Another do-gooder liberal mandate from the know-it-alls in DC has unintended consequences.

The same thing happens with the quota system in college admissions. Colleges are required to have a minimum percentage of black students to get federal funds etc., which means less openings for more qualified whites and Asians.

And then when the dropout rate and failure rate among those black students is over 50%, they act amazed. They should not have been there in the first place, just as these bad loans should have never been made also.

Liberalism fails every time it’s forced on us.


5 posted on 02/05/2008 5:52:56 AM PST by Ron in Acreage (Romney/Watts 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Make loans to deadbeats or we'll call you a racist?

It figures.

6 posted on 02/05/2008 5:53:39 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
In the 1980s, groups such as the activists at ACORN began pushing charges of "redlining"- claims that banks discriminated against minorities in mortgage lending.

A symptom of the cancer that was created in the 1960s.

7 posted on 02/05/2008 6:00:12 AM PST by kipita (“Love” is to humanity as gravitons are to an infinite # of universes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

And here’s an even better unintended consequence of the unintended consequence, young first time buyers who can afford a house, and have budgeted for it are going to find it harder and harder to get loans for homes now.


8 posted on 02/05/2008 6:01:22 AM PST by gjones77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OESY

The people who are being ignored in this mess are the ones who bought their houses for $30-80k and are now being taxed for a $250k house because the banks financed half million dollar houses in their neighborhoods. Now, instead of allowing the market to correct itself, the big gov is going to bailout the banks so the local gov can continue to gouge the people who paid their mortgages and eventually tax homeowners even more to cover the bailout.


9 posted on 02/05/2008 6:01:42 AM PST by shuckmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
There were plenty of banks who did not fall for this sub-prime lending nonsense and are not being terribly affected by the fallout. I wonder why these banks did not bow into this pressure?

I still have 0 sympathy for the banks who chose to make these bad loans. If someone's credit report shows very clearly that they are in no way prepared to pay a mortgage and the bank offers the loan anyway, then it is the bank's fault. These banks don't deserve any bailout for the problems that they brought onto themselves.

10 posted on 02/05/2008 6:01:43 AM PST by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
It’s discrimination when you don’t lend to the poor minority borrowers,...

Absolutely correct!

... it’s also discrimination when you do.

No, no, NO! It's discrimination when you expect them to pay it BACK.

11 posted on 02/05/2008 6:02:41 AM PST by nina0113 (If fences don't work, why does the White House have one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Ah, somebody finally discussing ACORN's involvement.

Good.

12 posted on 02/05/2008 6:04:11 AM PST by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
I wonder why these banks did not bow into this pressure?

They probably didn't need political favors to carry out their expansion and merger plans. ;)

Countrywide in particular was no victim in this - they were more than happy to push the envelope to grow their business. The article is engaging in a bit of revisionist history.

13 posted on 02/05/2008 6:05:34 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Not a surprise to anyone who has been paying attention.


14 posted on 02/05/2008 6:06:52 AM PST by tennteacher (Romney '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
From October....

Mortgages to Illegal Immigrants Come Under Fire

From the link....

According to a report given to the governor last year, immigrants made up more than 80 percent of new homeowners in suburban Cook County from 2000 to 2005.

Congress knew exactly what it was doing....

15 posted on 02/05/2008 6:07:11 AM PST by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
The article is engaging in a bit of revisionist history.

I also find it hard to believe that banks are really taking a hit here. Even when issuing these bad loans, I can't imagine the banks would be stupid enough to not have some sort of safety net so that they don't completely go under.

16 posted on 02/05/2008 6:11:03 AM PST by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
I still have 0 sympathy for the banks who chose to make these bad loans. If someone's credit report shows very clearly that they are in no way prepared to pay a mortgage and the bank offers the loan anyway, then it is the bank's fault.

If only every bad loan case were that simple.

17 posted on 02/05/2008 6:11:45 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

And Countrywide wasn’t a bank.


18 posted on 02/05/2008 6:14:10 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
It’s discrimination when you don’t lend to the poor minority borrowers, it’s also discrimination  predatory when you do.
19 posted on 02/05/2008 6:15:01 AM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

The rats are not interested in bailing out the banks and note holders. The rats want another entitlement: homeowning for the masses. The rats may bail out financial institutions to facilitate the new entitlement. The rats will demand that poor credit individuals must obtain credit at the same or lower rate as credit worthy individuals. SHE has already proposed the first step in this process. SHE has demanded a freeze on foreclosures and interest rates.

The left realizes that they made a mistake. They forced lending institutions to make loans to the non credit worthy. In their opinion, the mistake was not to demand that banks were allowed to charge higher interest rates for those individuals. The left wants to correct their mistake. They see a perfect opportunity to create a new entitlement.


20 posted on 02/05/2008 6:16:36 AM PST by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson