I never said what you are implying. You are still trying to equate technology and 'after the fact' story-telling. But I do understand that you must try to support 'after the fact' story-telling in an attempt to give it some credence.
I suppose that counts as a valid attempt in naturalistic circles.
All theories describe and explain things that have been observed. They also predict things to be expected and suggest things to look for.
What research is suggested by the assertion that an unspecified entity or entities having unspecified capabilities, limitations and motives, did some unspecified thing or things at unspecified times and places with unspecified results?