Court ordered deliberate act. You can argue the morality of such, but it is done under the jusidiction of the courts.
WRONG!
Amendment V:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,
Amendment VI:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
There has been NO INDICTMENT, even if there was, Lauren WOULD NOT even be aware of, much less able to assist in her defense or face her accusers.
"Vee ver joost vollowing orders!"
And you are free to ignore the morality of it. Which your posts make clear is what you prefer to do.