So . . .
What is your opinion of docs like this one:
http://www.namebase.org/news01.html
I’ve studied primary and near primary sources on such topics since I had to in my library job in 1965.
Mutter derisively all you wish about conspiracy sites . . . some have plenty of hokey stuff, it appears.
However, I believe that when the dust settles after Armageddon . . . the worst and most flakey of the sites will turn out to have been conservative and hardly have told half the horrid story.
REMEMBER.
It WAS the MOST flakey organizations, pamphlets, leaflets, posters, etc.
who MOST ACCURATELY AND EARLIEST
PREDICTED
WHO HITLER WAS AND WHAT HE WOULD DO.
The world’s foremost expert on that topic was my library boss.
Quix -
You may believe these sources to be valid. In my experience they have not provided valid information. From the stories raised over the past 10 years, our country should have been turned over to these powers multiple times over. There are plenty of more credible sites out there that I listen to and conspiracy sites just don’t make it past my common sense filter.