Posted on 02/01/2008 11:08:49 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
Republicans no longer control the Republican Party and as a result, they can not advance a truly Republican candidate though the current liberal leaning primary process. By the time 99 percent of Republicans get a chance to vote in the primaries, all real Republicans have already been eliminated from the race. Lesser evil choices are all that remain by Super Tuesday…?
How it Happened
It happened by two important factors.
First, Republicans refused to unite behind any of the conservatives originally in the race. They were divided, and all of their candidates failed as a result.
Evangelicals think Pastor Huckabee is the real conservative in the race based solely upon his evangelical preaching from the stump. Fiscal conservatives think that business man Mitt Romney is the real conservative in the race. Anti-war isolationists think that Ron Paul is the real conservative in the race. Border security – national sovereignty conservatives thought that Duncan Hunter or Tom Tancredo were the real conservatives in the race. War on Terror hawks thought that Rudy Giuliani was the real conservative in the race and the base of the Republican Party, those who are fully conservative on all the above, thought Fred Thompson was the real conservative in the race.
As a direct result of these divisions, the one candidate that is by no means a real conservative in the race, John McCain, is currently leading the race for the Republican nomination. Failing to unite early behind one of the conservatives, left the door wide open for the worst possible result, John McCain.
The second factor is a broken primary process. McCain is not being nominated by conservatives or for the most part, even by Republicans. He is being nominated by liberal voters from liberal leaning states who hold the earliest primaries and vote to eliminate all conservatives from the race before “fly-over” Republicans get a chance to cast a single vote.
A Broken Party
Like it or not, the BIG TENT is collapsing. You can’t invite liberals to your table without inviting their ideologies along. Try this at home with your liberal neighbors if you think I’m wrong on this. They will be happy to eat your food and drink your wine, while they tell you all about the progressive benefits of socialism. They won’t shut up until you stop inviting them for dinner.
Yet this is what the Republican Party leadership decided to do years ago. Invite liberals across the aisle into the fold under the BIG TENT open society philosophy whereby all ideas are welcome if not equal, even when they aren’t.
Today, the base of the party is trying to figure out if or how it can wrestle back control of their party from the dinner guest they invited to the table years ago. The problem is this. RINOs now think it’s their party. They have exercised squatter’s rights. They are using the “possession is nine tenths of the law” defense to claim ownership of the Republican Party now and demanding that “right-wing extremists” (the foundation of the party) leave. The guests are tossing out the hosts.
A Broken Process
How do you expect to advance a Republican candidate via a process designed to net a liberal candidate, voted upon by liberals in Democrat strongholds? The answer is - you can’t. Yet this is what we do.
It is not possible to advance a conservative candidate using liberal RINO, Independent and Democrat voters in liberal strongholds. The Republican primary process MUST change.
The Long-Term Fix
Only registered Republicans should be voting in Republican primaries and Republican primaries must begin in Republican strongholds, not Democrat strongholds up east. There should be no such thing as “open primaries.” Even in many “closed primaries” in Democrat stronghold states, where Republicans seldom have even a chance of carrying the state, many Democrats and Independents register as Republicans for the sole purpose of skewing the Republican nomination. This can not be allowed to continue.
Further, if the Republican nomination process expects to ever advance a conservative Republican candidate, it must start its nomination process in Republican strongholds across the country, not the Democrat strongholds they start in today.
The ten most Republican states in 2004 (a Republican year) were Utah, Wyoming, Idaho, Nebraska, Oklahoma, North Dakota, Alabama, Kansas, Alaska and Texas, in that order. Yet only one of these states has held a primary thus far, Wyoming. Before the rest will get a chance to vote, all Republicans are out of the race.
Other traditionally Republican strongholds are Indiana, South Dakota, Mississippi, Kentucky, Montana, Georgia, Tennessee and North Carolina. Pick the five most populated states from these two groups and start the nomination process there, if you want to see what real Republicans want for party leadership.
Three of the worst states in which to hold an early Republican primary are Michigan, New Hampshire and Iowa. Yet this is where we begin our nomination process?
Both of these things must change looking forward and they will have to be changed at the state level by simply getting Republican stronghold states to move their primaries up to the front of the line. Don’t count on any help from the Republican National Committee which has long since determined that Republicans must join liberals in order to compete with them.
The ONLY Short-Term Fix
These two changes in the nomination process will allow Republican stronghold states and real Republican voters to advance a real Republican candidate in the future. But it’s too late for 2008.
So a short-term answer for the immediate problem is also in order and only one option is available now…
That option is the subject of my last column, Time for Some REAL Straight Talk
Take a moment to read it quickly. Super Tuesday will set the next four years in stone. What we do between now and then makes a difference….
Republicans simply passed on all opportunities to do something smart and unite behind one of the conservatives in the race over the last several months. Now, doing something half-smart is the only immediate option available. Find a way to be part of the solution, not just an angry part of the problem acting out in childish temper tantrums and protest votes.
Half-smart is better than blindly foolish and all wrong any day…
Long term, things must change. But short term, our options are now limited to living to fight another day. Think about it!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1962819/posts A ray of hope from JimRob.
How do you know this, it hasn’t been tied in decades...
I disagree...
Give me liberty or give me death. The Republican Party will return to being the conservative party or it will cease to exist. We already have a liberal party, we don’t need two.
We are on the road to full blown socialism, there is nothing we are going to do about it. Nothing. It is the natural progression of human history, it will never change. The ignorant, jealous and lazy will always “win”.
Read some of the posts on this and many other threads.
Nothing has happened to the Republican Party that conservatives didn’t allow to happen.
We are committing suicide right here - right now. Read all the quitters comments.
The left is winning in our house, but only because we allow it.
I agree, any idea of how you go about changing which states vote in the Repubican primary first?
I didn’t know that McCain had considered leaving the Republican party in 2001. They’re reporting this on FOX now...by Bob Cusack from The Hill
I’ve been saying the same thing about the primaries.
IA,NH,FL,MI,SC,NV,WY
We need to not seat/count your delegates if you insist on being the first to choose who I get to vote for. You will be ignored.
The deck was stacked to be in favor of either Clinton or McCain, but not Barack Obama or Ron Paul.
Voting for either of two latter men would skew the deck.
BINGO!
Too busy and TOO LAZY and TOO frightened to fight for THEIR party!
When at war, refusing to fight IS committing suicide!
Believe me, we’re at war and not just with Islamic terror.
It started long before anyone even dreamed up that phrase.
TRUE
there is no way we will win another election, sad but true.
NOT TRUE
It will just take another Jimmy Carter.
Huh?
Or any one of the candidates running now IMO
Exactly... and so that we no longer allow liberal independs to choose our nominee.
Can’t argue with this guy.
With the remaining pieces on the board, Romney is still the only marginally acceptable candidate.
It would probably be better all around if the Rats won this one and perhaps we can rebuild for the next time around.
Kirk’s an idiot!
Sneaky.... I like it.
This is exactly what has happened on the other side.
This is war... there are no rules of engagement.
The current state of affairs is CONSERVATIVES fault. There were 3 solid conservative candidates that could have done very well.
Fred needed 5 mil in the first 30 days to BEGIN being a viable candidate and conservatives knew this. They sent 3.5 or so.
You all should have seen the tv here in Iowa during dinner time when the news was on!
HILLARY, OBAMA, Hillary, Obama, Mitt, Hillary, Obama, Hillary, Edwards, Obama, Hillary, Obama, Huck, Hillary, Obama, Hillary, Obama, Mitt, Huck, Hillary, Obama, Hillary, OBAMA, Edwards
And so it went for 30 days before the Iowa caucuses.
What's wrong with this picture? Where are the names Thompson, Hunter, Tancredo???? Nonexistent. Why?
Because "conservatives" saw 5 other candidates that are 5% conservative and 95% liberal and went for them like a fish striking a bright lure. And the candidates that were 95% conservative and 5% liberal were totally ignored until they were pretty much walking. Fred made about 58 stops in Iowa in 30 days, DRIVING stops, because he couldn't afford air time. Same with Hunter and Tancredo.
Please "conservatives", STOP THE WHINING about McCain or Romney being the only option.
You had good options and threw them away with both hands as quickly as you could!
Now you're going to strangle on the options you have left!
Exporting American principles is good. Importing international socialist principles is BAD.
As the world moves right, America is moving left.
There’s our problem.
If Romney gets the nomination, I might, repeat MIGHT be able to pull the lever for him. Otherwise, I’m very likely to write in Dunan Hunter or Fred Thompson, or vote Constitution Party if they make it on my state’s ballot. I won’t vote for a DIM and I won’t vote for McAztlan-Kennedy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.