To: steve-b
So who cares whether you are watching on 1 huge screen or on 15 smaller screens - it’s still a broadcast, for Pete’s sake.
Dumb, really dumb.
4 posted on
02/01/2008 5:14:54 AM PST by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
To: cinives
I would just have everyone bring a tv with them. For those who don’t have one to bring I would have donated or loaned sets available at the door. One of the sets that a party goer brought would be the big screen set. Then everyone would sit with their little sets turned on but be able to see the big one too. Then I would tell the NFL, “See you in court!”
Sometimes you just have to make something more trouble than it’s worth to make a point.
40 posted on
02/01/2008 5:40:28 AM PST by
jwparkerjr
(Sigh . . .)
To: cinives
So who cares whether you are watching on 1 huge screen or on 15 smaller screens - its still a broadcast, for Petes sake. Dumb, really dumb.
I agree. And I'd argue that the NFL is shooting itself in the foot on this because I bet that there would be more people attend a church potluck/Super Bowl event (therefore more eyeballs viewing the $2.7 million commercials) than would individually watch from home.
As long as there is no commerce going on, there is no problem.
43 posted on
02/01/2008 5:43:32 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson