Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NFL Pulls Plug On Big-Screen Church Parties For Super Bowl
The Washington Pest ^ | 2/1/08 | Jacqueline L. Salmon

Posted on 02/01/2008 5:12:40 AM PST by steve-b

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 next last
To: Wolfie
Apparently it’s better for the NFL if 1 person watches 100 TV sets than if 100 people watch 1 TV set.

All the more reason to have a big Super Bowl party -- bring down teh exorbitant rights fees and the obscene ad rates.

121 posted on 02/01/2008 7:30:51 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
this does technically qualify as a violation of their broadcasting rights.

In what way? Is it a closed-circuti broadcast? It's on the PUBLIC airwaves. if teh public wants to gather and watch, how dies that violate the NFL's rights?

122 posted on 02/01/2008 7:33:10 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: TBP

I don’t see how having the superbowl in church honors Christ.

It’s more like an obscene idol with wicked ads and half time show!

Tell me how this is any different than money changers in the temple that Jesus Christ drove out.


123 posted on 02/01/2008 7:38:53 AM PST by Rodm (Seest thou a man diligent in his business? He shall stand before kings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0
Let us not forget Geraldo getting booted out of Iraq in 2003 for broadcasting future battle plans to the enemy.

A little bit different thing, as national security in a war was involved.

Geraldo is a lousy journalist, an intolerant buffoon, and an offensive person. He was also associated with teh Young Lords Puerto Rican street gang. Fox should fire him.

He's the reason Michelle Malkin isn't on The O'Reilly Factor anymore. (I have that directly from Michelle; I emailed her to ask why.)

But I don't see what that has to do with the NFL's Supre Bowl policy.

124 posted on 02/01/2008 7:39:28 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
I have an employee who is also a bartender. At their bar, they have food, drinks and Superbowl on large screen for $60 per person.

I don't know how much they pay to be able to broadcast the game. But you must know that the bar would be pissed if a church next door was broadcasting it free with a large sign out front WATCH SUPERBOWL FREE HERE.

That's not my problem, is it? The bar can find other ways of drawing people in to their $60 party.

125 posted on 02/01/2008 7:42:19 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Rodm

In short, fellowship and community building, as many of us have previously posted.

If you somehow think that that dishonors God, tehn your God is too small.


126 posted on 02/01/2008 7:44:03 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

I thought the settled all this out last year. Their rule is very simple: no charging for anything called a Super Bowl party. But you can have a party to watch “The Big Game” and charge.

The big problem here is that the court have long established that undefended copyrights and logos go away, that’s why Bill Waterson no longer controls Calvin and Hobbes. If the NFL doesn’t defend their territory against all comers, including church groups, then they’ll lose the ability to defend against anybody. Meanwhile everybody needs to learn the rules: Big Game Party is OK, Super Bowl Party is not at least if there’s any form of admission fee including a donation plate.


127 posted on 02/01/2008 7:48:38 AM PST by discostu (a mountain is something you don't want to %^&* with)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

As I said earlier, wrong thread.


128 posted on 02/01/2008 7:51:08 AM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (Global warming is the new Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

The NFL has made its ruling. Now let it enforce it. We are holding a huge-screen Super Bowl party, and I welcome the NFL to try and stop us.


129 posted on 02/01/2008 7:53:14 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

I’m glad the NFL is doing this. The Super Bowl has no place being shown in church.


130 posted on 02/01/2008 7:55:12 AM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith

Bars are exempted because bars spend a lot of money on their TV hookups, more than regular people would for a similar setup, and a good chunk of that money goes to the leagues. Even then they do have some limits on whether or not they can advertise themselves as a place to watch the Super Bowl (or the NCAA Tournament which is also rigorously defended). If you’ll notice most sports bar advertising generally talks about “the big game”, which works for two reason, it means they don’t have to change the commercial as often, and it keeps them from getting in any trouble with the leagues. You to can charge for a Big Game party, assuming you don’t violate zoning regs of course.


131 posted on 02/01/2008 7:56:51 AM PST by discostu (a mountain is something you don't want to %^&* with)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
"Probably the same way that music copyright works. Anytime you hear music in a restaurant, the music must purchase a liscense for playing it. ASCAP, BMI etc are famous for the way they intimidate business across the nation with large fines in order to build their membership base."

At a business where I used to work, they got a warning letter from the RIAA for playing music on their phone systems for people to listen to while on hold.

132 posted on 02/01/2008 8:00:25 AM PST by KoRn (CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

My guess is that they are shutting down the church parties so that the broadcast can be more obscene than the Janet Jsckson fiasco. They would call it “edgy”.

Haven’t watched since Janet Jackson, won’t again this year.


133 posted on 02/01/2008 8:05:42 AM PST by TexanToTheCore (If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

I have not read this whole thread, so someone may have posted before me, but I bet the issue is that the church charges an admission fee as a fund raiser. That would be a violation of NFL copyright.


134 posted on 02/01/2008 8:11:59 AM PST by JimmyMc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tex Pete

Evangelism is not becoming like the world to attract the world.

What about “be ye separate?”


135 posted on 02/01/2008 8:25:49 AM PST by AnnGora (Southern conservative Gooberette)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: discostu

I’ve been reminded of another reason: in many markets, bar-owners own lots of season tickets. Back in the olden days, the bars couldn’t show the games unless it was sold out (still the case, but these days, most games sell out, right?). So the bars would buy up the season tickets so their customers could watch the game.


136 posted on 02/01/2008 8:36:46 AM PST by Tanniker Smith (Geek Squad -- if you're desperate and don't need a PC for over a month, we'll get around to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

This is a worse PR stunt than Ford suing the Ford fan club over the use of its name. PR + Legal = Bozo.


137 posted on 02/01/2008 9:05:59 AM PST by Kevmo (We need to get rid of the Kennedy Wing of the Republican Party. ~Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
Didn't we do this last year?

Yeah. It's the equivalent of a groundhog day story. Just hang it on the hook, dust it off every year, change the location, and publish it.

138 posted on 02/01/2008 9:10:27 AM PST by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TBP

My God is the God of Bible. God isn’t small because He doesn’t accept every form of worldliness.


139 posted on 02/01/2008 9:14:12 AM PST by Rodm (Seest thou a man diligent in his business? He shall stand before kings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: TBP
The NFL is anti-family, anti-community, and anti-church.

Ironically, the commissioner is a Republican. His father was a RINO-Liberal Party Senator. His father-in-law was in Bush 41's Cabinet and his wife is with Fox News.

Laura Bush was on Fox & Friends this morning. She said they were having people over to watch the Super Bowl on the White House's large-screen TV.

I wonder if this is against the NFL viewing policy? ; )

140 posted on 02/01/2008 9:24:13 AM PST by I want to know
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson