I winced when she challenged the 9-11 widows too but only because it was harsh and taken out of context, imo. She was right. I didn’t get why she did it either but her take on it all was dead on.
Maybe it’s satire now, her whole campaigning for Hillary because her guy may not win. I don’t know. Maybe I have to read it again, and I posted on the other thread how this statement by her kills me and makes me see her differently. But maybe I’m not getting her sublety here. Or whatever she’s trying to say. I winced when she made that statement about the 9-11 widows but saw she was right and sometimes right is harsh. And she was right about them imo. So maybe she’s making a point that I’m missing this time. I hope it’s so anyway. I really do like her.
Of course it’s satire. What difference does it make to conservatives if the liberal with the R next to their name or the liberal with the D next to their name or the liberal with the X, P, Q, F next to their name wins?