Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robbin

A socialist (Obama) vs. a waffling centrist (McCain).... hmm.... yeah, let’s vote for the socialist.


3 posted on 01/31/2008 12:04:53 PM PST by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: squidly

“A socialist (Obama) vs. a waffling centrist (McCain)....”

You mean a socialist (Obama) vs. a liberal, dishonest, back-stabber (McCain).

I’ll vote third party.


15 posted on 01/31/2008 12:09:23 PM PST by tabsternager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: squidly
If Obama is the nominee then the Clintons will do whatever it takes to make certain he loses....and we get McPain.

If Obama wins she cannot run again until 2016 as Obama would become the nominee again in 2012...she would be simply too old and haggard in 2016....ewwww

If Clinton is the nominee then McPain can win because there is likely a mountain of dirt that will be trotted out to tarnish her....there are probably vaults full of scandal being held for the proper time. If she gets the nomination she will probably have offended a chunk of the black vote and they will sit out the election. Then there is the fact that she is probably the only thing that will drive republicans and independents to the polls....to vote against her.

We just may end up with McPain as our unstable and spiteful president.... if so we will be damn lucky to avoid WW3.

PRAY


80 posted on 01/31/2008 1:16:30 PM PST by Bobalu (I guess I done see'd that varmint for the last time....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson