I know people will oppose Romney, and don’t expect to change their minds, but for those who are still looking to make a rational decision, I feel it is helpful to note the comparative worth of the opinions being offered.
Perhaps the opinion offered has as much WORTH as others....I didn't know we had a "worthiness" standard on FR, nor just WHO was to judge it, nor a standard as to what should be allowed in a post outside of the usual FR posting rules.
In fact, I simply wanted to explain to the poster that so long as he simply voiced an opinion with no factual basis, I would be trusting Mark Levin’s opinion rather than his opinion.
Then why not simply say so instead of I trust Mark’s opinion much more than yours, “Antoninus”. Mark Levin is a real person who puts his real reputation on the line and has concluded that Romney is to be trusted enough to see him as better than McCain.
John McCain went to bat against the Fairness Doctrine, but I haven't heard any of these radio hosts give him credit for that. Has Mark?
McCain introduces talk radio legislation
"Arizona Sen. John McCain has introduced federal legislation to protect talk radio shows from the reinstatement of past rules that required dissenting voices be given equal time on their shows."
One has to wonder what influences Clear Channel/Premier Radio Networks exercise since the purchase by Bain Capital. And regardless that Mitt is no longer an OWNER of Bain, the "good old boy network" is a factor in business.