Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Petronski
Mark is right. If you don't vote for Mitt, it is effectively a vote for McCain's nomination. You can spin it and deny it anyway you like. But those are the facts.

This is not some game. This is the future of our country we are talking about. The choosing of those next SCOTUS judges being key. I have no doubt that the holier-than-thou purists can look in the mirror and thank themselves when Hill & Bill are sitting in our Oval Office again selecting the next Ginsburg (or McCain choosing the next O'Connor if he can squeak out a win by some miracle).

Those who cannot see the difference between Mitt and McCain, do so at our country's peril. McCain agrees with them (Hillary & Obama) NOT US (and Mitt) on global warming, immigration, amnesty, marriage amendment, embryonic stem cell research funding, lawyer lobbyists, big government, terrorists' rights, social security for illegals, Gitmo, waterboarding, judges etc.

29 posted on 01/31/2008 10:53:00 AM PST by redgirlinabluestate (Unite 4 Mitt --- Stop McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: redgirlinabluestate
If you don't vote for Mitt, it is effectively a vote for McCain's nomination.

Nope. Not effectively, not a fact.

Neither one of those pathetic liberals was ever getting my vote.

37 posted on 01/31/2008 10:55:11 AM PST by Petronski (People get the kind of government they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: redgirlinabluestate
Those who cannot see the difference between Mitt and McCain

Who would that be? I can see the difference, just as I can see the difference between hemlock and cyanide.

...do so at our country's peril.

Either way lies our country's peril.

41 posted on 01/31/2008 10:57:43 AM PST by Petronski (People get the kind of government they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: redgirlinabluestate
Mark is right. If you don't vote for Mitt, it is effectively a vote for McCain's nomination. You can spin it and deny it anyway you like. But those are the facts.

This is not some game. This is the future of our country we are talking about. The choosing of those next SCOTUS judges being key.

That is exactly the major issue here. And remember, a vote for McCain (including all votes for Huckabee) is a vote for Obama/Clinton, and thus, as you note, 30+ years of a leftward leaning Supreme Court.

92 posted on 01/31/2008 11:20:29 AM PST by Tirian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: redgirlinabluestate
Republicans who vote for McCain are trying to be cute, like the Democrats were four years ago by voting for the "pragmatic" candidate, Vietnam vet John Kerry. This will turn out to be precisely as clever a gambit as nominating Kerry was, the brilliance of which was revealed on Election Day 2004.

Here Here! Thank You!

I'm all in for Mitt. I cannot abide John McCain as the nominee or as President.

I was for Hunter... I was for Fred... they're gone and the only viable candidate left is Mitt Romney. I do not believe the differences between Obama / Clinton / McCain Admins would be discernible.

457 posted on 01/31/2008 4:50:13 PM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson