[CharlesWayneCT]

That article speaks to a man who follows the law. Sorry, there’s a lot of “conservatives” who think the law should be ignored when we disagree with it. But that’s not how it works.

[manapua]

You are willingly blind. There are two things wrong with your fantasy: 1. A standing religious conscience statute that was never struck legislatively or judicially, and 2. the Massachusetts constitution itself and its provisions for free religious exercise. The Romney administration could have fought the legislature's forcing of "Plan B" into private hospitals. To his administration's credit, they initially supported Catholic Hospitals' objections to being forced to make "Plan B" pills available, but once the pro-abortion movement went into action, the Romney administration quickly reversed itself. This is stunning news to any conservatives paying attention at the time.

Totally unwilling to fight for basic principles of religious freedom and conscience, private enterprise, and free association. That's a conservative record?

Look up his similar record on religion, free association, and adoption policy. The man doesn't actually stand for anything.

[Petronski]

That article speaks to a man who follows the law. Sorry, there’s a lot of “conservatives” who think the law should be ignored when we disagree with it. But that’s not how it works.

I just love it when Team Willard presents the Good German defense.