Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: manapua

When conservatives are willing to spit on conservative principles being sold by an articulate and forceful spokesperson, simply because of that person’s past, we are in real trouble.

Sure, given two people giving their heart and soul and money to sell conservatism to the country are available, and one of them has been there longer, go with the guy with the longer record.

But Romney IS the guy with the longer record, because nobody else is standing up for conservative values now. It’s Romney or McCain. One has a list of 26 solid consrvative positions. The other is running on a platform that is riddled with anti-conservative positions.

And you’d reject the solid conservative platform because you fear the messenger? And you’d denigrate those who simply don’t have the same mistrust that you do?


175 posted on 01/31/2008 11:49:49 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
You make a good point *if* the messenger in question actually believes in and can be trusted to fight for the platform. In this case, I have a sneaking suspicion - backed by evidence - that the messenger's platform is merely a transitory tool.

I argue that we're already in trouble if the spokesman for conservative principles is a transparent phony. Our mistrust has more basis in reality and record than Romney's two-year old devotion to conservatism.

206 posted on 01/31/2008 12:04:37 PM PST by manapua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson