[txlurker]

I disagree...they both have legitimate voices that need to be heard....social conservatism and libertatianism re not irrrational at their core...they are about what is and has been the best of this nation...a belief in God as our creator and through whom ALL of our rights are founded, and a belief in our Constitution whereby our government is restricted and dirtected to serve the people and not the people serving government.

I don't disagree with hearing legitimate voices but the bottom line is neither Paul or Huckabee have a snowballs chance at this point. Let's narrow it down to the top two. I am sorry if that is one of your candidates but they are not helping at this time.

[Eva]

Swarzenegger said that Hucabee served a good purpose in stopping Romney’s momentum. He said that Romney was a good debater and that Romney had a right to have something to say and besides he stopped Romney’s momentum.

[GLH3IL]

Neither are my guys, my guys are no longer running sadly, but the ideas brought up by Huckabee and Paul should be listened to. We are not Democrats. We are not liberals. The Arena of Ideas is where we are at our strongest. Even in this debate, we discussed more matters of substance than the Democrats would everdream of debating about.

Let ‘em stay and debate, such discussions ca only serve to make Republicans stronger in the future.