To: CautiouslyHopeful
If Paul wasn’t a moonbat on the war, I’d support him. I like everything else I’ve heard him say, but the war’s a deal breaker.
Fred Thompson is still on my ballot and I’m voting for him anyway.
3 posted on
01/25/2008 1:02:30 PM PST by
Redcloak
(Dingos ate my tagline.)
To: Redcloak
The war is maybe the only thing I don’t agree with him on. I disagree with the others far more.
25 posted on
01/25/2008 1:11:22 PM PST by
stevio
((NRA))
To: Redcloak
If Paul wasnt a moonbat on the war, Id support him.
Same here. I have strong libertarian leanings, but Paul is way off base on foreign policy. Plus there just something about the guy that kinda bothers me.
30 posted on
01/25/2008 1:12:20 PM PST by
zencat
(The universe is not what it appears, nor is it something else.)
To: Redcloak
“”If Paul wasnt a moonbat on the war, Id support him. I like everything else Ive heard him say, but the wars a deal breaker.
Fred Thompson is still on my ballot and Im voting for him anyway.””
Exactly my sentiment!!
35 posted on
01/25/2008 1:13:18 PM PST by
o_zarkman44
(No Bull in 08!)
To: Redcloak
If Paul wasnt a moonbat on the war His opinions on the war is shared by over two-thirds of the country. How are the other RINOs going to get these votes?
With Paul, the war stand is neutralized with Hillary, who doesn't have any credibility. He'll be able to pull off a huge chunk of her base in the general election.
Furthermore, Paul would still leave behind a contingent of troops to keep going after bin Laden.
To: Redcloak
Fred Thompson is still on my ballot and Im voting for him anyway. Good! I've been elected as a delegate, from my precinct, to my county convention. I intend to keep supporting Fred. He might have dropped out of the race, but he could still bring some delegates to the national convention.
206 posted on
01/25/2008 3:07:23 PM PST by
3niner
(War is one game where the home team always loses.)
To: Redcloak
"Fred Thompson is still on my ballot and Im voting for him anyway." That's the kind of thinking that will have us choosing between McSenator, and Ms. Senator. Please don't do it. We have a viable candidate in Romney; not perfect, but better than any of the rest that remain.
242 posted on
01/25/2008 3:42:19 PM PST by
editor-surveyor
(Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
To: Redcloak
"If Paul wasnt a moonbat on the war, Id support him."
Ron's real problem is not necessarily his position on the war, but his naivete on the threat of radical Islam.
244 posted on
01/25/2008 3:47:06 PM PST by
rob777
(Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
To: Redcloak
I don't know that Paul's a moonbat on the war. By his own description (and it matches his voting record, I think) he'd be a "Constitutionalist."
"Congress shall have power to ... declare War."
I am open to correction.
260 posted on
01/25/2008 4:05:49 PM PST by
Mrs. Don-o
(I'm just sayin')
To: Redcloak
If Paul wasnt a moonbat on the war, Id support him. I like everything else Ive heard him say, but the wars a deal breaker.since nobody left will (by their past record - not current claims) close the border, they're all bad on the war. This war is with fundamentalist Islam, not a couple of countries on another continent. That said you're right Ron Paul's a moonbat.
Let's hope for a brokered convention, and a new candidate that doesn't cause some major conservative faction to stay home. All four remaining Republicans cause someone to stay home, and the bleating of their partisans about other's principled opposition to their chosen Rino gets old.
339 posted on
01/25/2008 9:27:56 PM PST by
MrEdd
(Heck is the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aren't going.)
To: Redcloak
And not just a 'run-of-the-mill' moonbat a full blown 'Michael-Moore-Cindy-Sheehan' Conspiracy Theorist Moonbat
385 posted on
01/26/2008 4:59:06 PM PST by
Reily
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson