Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beezdotcom
"sensible militarism' does not include the type of abrupt withdrawal that most in the Paul camp seem to espouse"

Paul has said he would withdraw troops from Iraq over a 6 - 12 month period.

295 posted on 01/25/2008 5:16:41 PM PST by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: be-baw
Paul has said he would withdraw troops from Iraq over a 6 - 12 month period.

That's still extremely abbreviated - but aside from that, you still need to cite a reference to that particular schedule. Most places, all I see from Paul is a fancy dodge about how he WON'T name a timeframe, except to say "without delay" or "immediately". It's usually his SUPPORTERS who try to "fill in the blanks" for him.

Therefore, if you can muster a more direct Paul quote, I suggest you place it on the table. (And, in case you're tempted to use THIS one, a bill to 'sunset funding after six months' as a Congressman does not really illuminate how aggressive his policy as President would be.)

You might ask "well, how come you're making Paul set a timetable when you won't make Bush set one?" Because Paul is the one trying to win points from Bush NOT setting such a timetable, and NOT bringing the troops home 'soon enough'. Therefore, if he's going to make his bones with such an argument, he had better be prepared to say specifically what IS soon enough, and say how that would work. Just saying "sooner than the other folks" doesn't say nearly enough to get any credit, and saying "immediately" without a definition doesn't even begin to discuss reality.
380 posted on 01/26/2008 3:03:37 PM PST by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson