Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
Here is the operative part of Romney's answer, the one that governs what he will do as President:

Once again, the Mitt-botts seem to think we need them to parse what Mitt has said in order to understand what Mitt has said.

And in this case, Mitt seems to be both supporting the 2nd amendment and attacking the 2nd amendment on one statement.

This gives a whole new meaning to the phrase flip-flop!

What part of the following do you and Mitt NOT understand:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
167 posted on 01/25/2008 1:05:40 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie

The same part that 99.99% of the people in the country, including all of our elected officials, don’t understand, according to you — all those who are not looking to repeal every gun law ever passed that restrict access to weapons.


199 posted on 01/25/2008 2:15:55 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson