Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Young Scholar

He said “no candidate.”

Your powers of self-delusion are amazing.


91 posted on 01/24/2008 12:15:59 PM PST by TheThirdRuffian (Don't blame me; I will write in Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: TheThirdRuffian
He said no candidate is a down-the-line conservative. Neither was Bush, and neither was Reagan. He did not say he was unlikely to support any candidate.

Here's a link to some more stuff Rush said about Romney if you have any doubt he would vote for him:

Mitt Romney's Inspiring Speech

Here's an excerpt from near the bottom:

"Now, just a couple final thoughts here on the Romney speech and the atmosphere surrounding it. As I mentioned, I don't endorse candidates in primaries, but Romney certainly should have our attention in a good way."

You're stretching Rush's words to imply he was saying something he clearly wasn't.

99 posted on 01/24/2008 12:56:36 PM PST by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: TheThirdRuffian

He said no candidate was 100% conservative. He didn’t say that would keep him from supporting a candidate.

He said he was voting for one of them. Before he said that, he said there were one or two he COULD vote for.

It’s clear the two are Rudy and Romney. Don’t have any idea which of those two he will actually vote for, and I’m certain he’s not going to tell us.


108 posted on 01/24/2008 1:05:09 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson