To: teddyballgame
I would rather a RAT was elected than one of the liberal puke twins.
That gives a conservative a chance in 2012.
581 posted on
01/22/2008 12:13:42 PM PST by
Beagle8U
(FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
It may not be emotionally satisfying to vote for the lesser of two evils but a lot depends on how bad the worse evil is. Nobody running on the Republican ticket is as dangerous as the Clintons. Thomas Sowell couple of days ago.
To: Beagle8U
I hope you reconsider. If my candidate lost, I’d still hold my nose and support the Republican nominee, on the sole issue of terrorism. A Clinton or Obama Presidecy would slash the military, minimize any threat, and put this country in grave danger.
622 posted on
01/22/2008 12:21:18 PM PST by
teddyballgame
(red man in a blue state)
To: Beagle8U
I would rather a RAT was elected than one of the liberal puke twins. That gives a conservative a chance in 2012. Many thought felt the same way in '92. They gave us eight years of Bill Clinton. You want to join that crowd?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson