Replies

Okay troll, I’ve had enough of you. Half of your abusive posts to me have been deleted. You’ve been warned.
And still you continue.

It's not a question of "continuing", it's a question of responding to your posts that simply make no sense at all.

You think you're being 'abused'?

OK, show me one thing in post #1204 that is abusive.

You had stated that you would be "proud to vote for Hunter if it were not for his supporters", and I called you on it (So did another poster).

As for being 'warned', the mod told BOTH of us to refrain from personal attacks. I never considered anything I posted to you to be personal at all. Hell, I like you Petro, you've got all the perseverence of one of those bumper cars that keep on crashing into the wall no matter what, hey: that kind of determination isn't seen every day, you know what I'm saying here?

Now once again, I re-direct you to my post #1204 and ask you what is "trollish" about that post, or what is "abusive" about the question I ask you, which is:

IF it is true that you would be "proud to vote for Hunter" if it were not for his supporters, does that not suggest that you are so easily swayed that your vote can be altered by anybody's behavior that upsets or offends you?

ANYbody who knows anything about me at all knows that the last thing I am, is a troll, but your use of that term does not surprise me as you were so quick to assert that Duncan Hunter was not "in it to win", and you still haven't been able to refute my rebuttal and facts pointing to Hunter *definitely* being in the campaign to win, and you have been unable to substantiate or defend your assertion to the contrary.

Now if you're just looking for a reason to step away from the thread, why just say so and then do it.

But don't go and try to re-write the history of a thread without expecting to get called on it. What you said and what you posted is there for all to see.