To: Owen
Why Romney? Why not back Paul, or Huckabee, or any other whack job running as a conservative?
Just because the candidate has an R after their name doesn’t make them optimal, or conservative.
If the party doesn’t want to put up a credible candidate, I don’t have to support it.
100 posted on
01/22/2008 11:29:02 AM PST by
RinaseaofDs
(If you stand for nothing, you'll fall for anything)
To: RinaseaofDs
Romney is OK, and may just make a good conservative President.
130 posted on
01/22/2008 11:31:37 AM PST by
razzle
Oh well...let’s look to 2012. Better to sit this one out.
219 posted on
01/22/2008 11:38:03 AM PST by
Def Conservative
(Screaming "Hillary Clinton!" isn't going to scare me into voting for Huckabee or McCain)
To: RinaseaofDs
Well first Hunter, now Thompson... I am looking into both Paul and Romney now. The others just make me sick.
589 posted on
01/22/2008 12:15:00 PM PST by
Xenophon450
(I guess I'll never know, some things under the sun can never be understood...)
To: RinaseaofDs; Halgr; Borax Queen; processing please hold; yorkie
Just because the candidate has an R after their name doesn’t make them optimal, or conservative. If the party doesn’t want to put up a credible candidate, I don’t have to support it.
D@mn straight!
I won't vote for a Rat with lipstick on an "R" ticket
any more than I would want a wolf in sheep's clothing "guarding" my children.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson