You have a right to vote for anybody, or to not vote. Just don’t try to fool anybody here, if McCain is the Rep. candidate and it’s hillary vs McCain, and you refuse to vote, you *ARE* voting for Hillary.
If you rather have Hillary, that’s fine, let’s just be clear about it and wait for her to destroy the country.
No.
Hillary will need more time than two years to destroy the country. She will have screwed up so badly by the midterms that the Repubs, if they are worth anything at all anymore, should be able to pick up enough seats to stonewall her and she will a one term President.
If McClown gets nominated and, even worse, actually elected, he will have effectively destroyed the only political base conservatives have in America and we will be forced to start new party. We can’t tolerate another Gerlad Ford regime or even another Bush I or Bush II regime representing us. McClown is not as radical as she is and will probably influence mainstream Republican philosophy by drivng it leftwards.
So, Hillary in the White is not worse than John McClown. But a Hillary win would be worse than a Romney in the White House or very possibly even worse than a JulieAnnie or a Huckleberry.
At this point, the best crack conservatives have is to back Romney or Huckleberry and hope for the best, or vote third party if McClown gets nominated.
But I’m confident that in the next states, unlike all those which held primaries already, the inability of McClown to drawn on cross-over Dems and liberal independents will prevent him from winning any more significant delegates.
Some of us have principles, and will not vote for anyone who destroys our principles.
did you flunk elementary math?
did you flunk elementary math?