The “Stupid Party” is foisting RINOs and liberal Republicans before us.
The stupid party is doing no such thing, your protestations to the contrary, and the only way it will be mz clinton, is if folks like you continue the negative attacks on the candidates who have chosen to run for President of the United States, under the Republican banner.
In addition, there are a host of folks with the same stupid message, with the equally dumb disclaimer that they will find it just impossible to vote for this or that Republican candidate, who just doesn’t measure up to the very narrow view of candidate qualifications equaling “perfect” in their eyes.
It is dumb people with dumb ideas that are hoping Hillary wins so they can crow “I told you so”. It is dumb people with dumb ideas who will chose not to vote for a Republican candidate deemed less than perfect, who will possibly allow Hillary in. It is dumb people with dumb ideas who can’t get past their negativism who will willingly grant Hillary the win.
Remaining comments self censored!
Because I will not transgress my principles I am dumb? Good luck to you in the future with your new party, you know, the we USED to call the republican party. Just call yourselves progressive lite!
I just won't.
If the GOP wants to lose big time and send the country down a path that is not Conservative, it can do it without me.
I am tired of being lied to, tired of giving money to candidates and then seeing them stab me in the back, and tired of voting for politicians with a clothes pin in my nose.
It works like this:
"candidates who have chosen to run for President of the United States, under the Republican banner" have historically been thought of as more conservative across the board than those who chose to run under the demorcat banner. Our experience with GWB (Jorge), with McPain, and (saw this one coming) Arnold of California, suggest that the distinctions have eroded. The current list of potential candidates confirms the fear by including zero conservative content and damn little believable rhetoric...except for Thompson.
If there is no difference between the two parties - where is the benefit of having two parties?
It isn't candidate worship, it's candidate vacuum. But, if you define a vacuum as (relatively) 'negative', then your post is about half right.