Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RangerM
Do you understand that Huck supporters, by backing a fiscal liberal and a man weak on defense you have alienated fiscal/defense voters from ever backing your guy? You could have had it all with Fred as far as a candidate goes but you got greedy. Now if Fred does poorly and drops out Huck will suffer because most Fred supporters will back Romney or someone else? If Fred goes the values voters will be replaced with moderates and we both lose. If I can get security and low taxes and spending with McCain or Rudy or Mitt, why would I choose Huckabee who has lied through his teeth since starting his campaign? No matter what Huckster, your guys have lost, unless a solidly pro life guy like Fred wins the nomination. I would prefer a guy who is pro life but if I have to choose between the three legs of the Republican Party I will choose low taxes and strong military.
47 posted on 01/21/2008 5:01:49 AM PST by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: normy
As you blame everyone else for Fred Thompson's poor primary showing, you might want to consider most of us have not had a chance to vote yet.

How are we supposed to affect primary results in Iowa, New Hampshire, or South Carolina if we don't live there?

Sheesh!

90 posted on 01/21/2008 6:00:29 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson