[RangerM]

Such language of “exclusivity” only supports my point. (ie Fred is the ONLY [choose your preferred quality here])

He isn’t the Lord and Savior people.

[Rational Thought]

He isn’t the Lord. What he is to True Conservatives, is the last one representing our interests.

The Republican establishment seems to think you can build a house without a foundation/base. Good luck to them.

[Always Right]

Such language of “exclusivity” only supports my point.

Saying someone is the only candidate who supports your viewpoint is far from worshiping that person. I am tired of such inflammatory posts on this forum from all sides. You don't have to accuse people of blasphemy to make a point, unless you have no point to make. I have legitimate beefs against all the other candidates, and it has nothing to do with worshiping a candidate.

[normy]

The deceitful tactics used by Huck and his supporters show their brand of Christianity shining through. I would rather you say ‘Huck is better than Fred because”. Why can’t Huck supporters back their candidate with solid facts? Deceitful and passive aggressive just like Huckabee. That man will never see the White House. Maybe Fred wont either but Huck never will and I for one would prefer his supporters form a 3rd party when this is all over. The Republican Party doesn’t need Religionists Socialist anymore than it needs secular Socialists.

[mad_as_he$$]

"He isn’t the Lord and Savior people"

In this mess he is the closest thing. Let's just say I mistrust him the least.