I did hear him say this YESTERDAY on one of the talk shows, but it’s easy to criticize when you’re the beneficiary of the attacks.
Again, like Hillary saying “I’ll give'em their money back......... if they take it ....or maybe they can return it to the campaign... which means we don’t have to give it back.. which means I’ll keep the money after all..”
You can’t unring the bell, but that’s politics.
You accused him of not publicly calling on whomever was responsible to stop the calls. That was false. He publicly criticized the calls in Iowa, in NH, and again in SC. So first you falsely accuse him, then when proven wrong, say that it was “easy” for him to criticize the calls. Please explain exactly, precisely what — if anything — additional he could do about the calls that you believe would be sufficient and honorable.