Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom

“So two border patrol agents were convicted on the word of a drug running illegal?”

Several of the jury members were quoted as saying they paid little attention to the testimony of OAD but convicted on R&C’s own unbelieveable and contradictory testimony, the damning testimony of other agents on the scene whose statements directly contradicted those of R&C, and their attempted cover up of the incident.

One was even quoted saying “It’s sad when the testimony of a drug mule is more believeable than that of the officers.”

You have all these people misrepresenting what went on that day and at trial and not one of them has bothered to read the trial transcripts to find out what really happened.

That’s real honorable. </s>


42 posted on 01/18/2008 8:48:48 AM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Bob J

“One was even quoted saying “It’s sad when the testimony of a drug mule is more believeable than that of the officers.””

I thought you said the jury hardly paid attention to what OAD said?

One more comment regarding a reply of yours a little earlier. The bullet did not bounce off the pelvis. The pelvis is empty area between what most refer to as the hip bone. Someone who testified at the trial referred to the pelvic bone being shattered, I believe he was referring to the left hip bone.


118 posted on 01/18/2008 6:51:04 PM PST by mjaneangels@aolcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson