Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

One small detail is left out: They weren’t convicted for shooting the drug smuggler. They were convicted because of what they did to cover it up.


108 posted on 01/18/2008 6:13:06 PM PST by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DaGman

“One small detail is left out: They weren’t convicted for shooting the drug smuggler...”

Actually, they were convicted of assault. But not on a drug smuggler as they didn’t know that he was at the time they shot him. They didn’t even know if he was an illegal.

They just shot him because he made them look bad.


111 posted on 01/18/2008 6:22:38 PM PST by Bob J ("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one is striking at it's root.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: DaGman

WHich is an even bigger mystery, since their supervisors were there after the incident.

That crime, cover up, if it even ocurred, was a slap on teh wrist. Instead some dumb prick of a prosecutor decided to be the first in the country to try to use a law that adds 10 years to a sentence. Complete and utter misapplication.


153 posted on 01/18/2008 9:12:31 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson