[calcowgirl]

Voting “no” is usually a safe vote. Occasionally there is something worthy of a “yes,” but rarely.
It seems there are always damaging repercussions buried in the fine print.

[oldbrowser]

Voting “no” is usually a safe vote.

And they know that so they write some of the propositions with double and triple negatives so you don't know whether you are voting for or against.

[ErnBatavia]

Voting “no” is usually a safe vote. Occasionally there is something worthy of a “yes,”

A little trickery on the ballot is Prop 93. I'm voting no....at a very brief glance, if you want to continue term limits, you'd think you might want to vote yes, but it's the opposite.