Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobbyS
No, evolution is a broad category that has so many elements that many different specialists can testify about it.

The element of evolution that the Dover school board found offensive was common descent. There really aren't any competent scientists who disagree with common descent. Even the Discovery Institutes's experts do not question common descent.

A school board cannot override the consensus of science because it finds science inconvenient for religious reasons. And the religious motivation of the school board was established beyond doubt by testimony given under oath.

69 posted on 01/18/2008 6:54:24 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: js1138

As far as consensus is concerned, the great majority of scholars disagreed with Galileo about the reality of a heliocentric universe. When “everyone” is an an Aristotlean, a contrarian has few allies. As you admit, the ID people accepted common descent so the judge chose one theory of evolution over another, even though one has the merit of being less offensive to the community than others. At bottom, the judge was simply bowing to convention, the “everyone-I-know—voted— for— McGovern” syndrome.


70 posted on 01/18/2008 8:24:02 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson