[Coyoteman]

ID promises to provide an opportunity to look at the data from a new perspective, and a potential to drag the debate into chaos squabbling over the Designer.

That "new perspective" was abandoned by science a couple of centuries ago as unproductive.

And there would be no squabble over the designer. The proponents of ID are nearly unanimous that the designer was the Christian god. They just can't admit it, as they have to pretend ID is science.

[tacticalogic]

I only committed to it making the promise, not actual delivery.

[tacticalogic]

And there would be no squabble over the designer. The proponents of ID are nearly unanimous that the designer was the Christian god.

From what I've seen, they'll agree to that and then squabble over who is and isn't a "Christian".