[Jokelahoma]

I completely disagree. I think he gets a lot of his support from anti-war lefties who don't see the Democrats as willing to surrender fast enough. I see him as much Nader as Perot.

[kdot]

Excellent point!

[VirginiaConstitutionalist]

I think he gets a lot of his support from anti-war lefties who don't see the Democrats as willing to surrender fast enough.

Then why aren't they voting for him in the primaries? I keep hearing the "he's a Democrat plant" conspiracy theory being whined, but no one's ever been able to produce anything to back it up. Where are the hordes of liberal cross-overs the anti-Paul nuts keep hallucinating about?

[no dems]

I agree with your Post #9. The looney, anti-war, lefties would run to him en masse.

[mainerforglobalwarming]

I think Paul hurts hillary more than the gop as well. He’s the cut and run candidate, plain and simple. He wants to let the Islamic Facists rule the world. The were in Iraq before we invaded, hundreds were in Ansar Al Islam. saddam as we’ve learned had WMD’s and was in position to restart his nuke program. Was allied with Al-qaeda. Had a non-agression pact with them. Gave them aid and mediacal treatment.Yet Ron Paul thinks Iraq was no threat to us. And today our victory in Iraq is crushing al-qeada’s influnce in the Muslim world. So run paul run. You’re just what the left-wing idiots need. A fool to rally around.