Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duncan Hunter -- Yes, He's Still Running
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/news-desk/2008/01/14/duncan-hunter----yes-hes-still-running.html ^ | 1/14/08 | Kent Garber

Posted on 01/14/2008 2:45:59 PM PST by mdittmar

Lest you forget it, Rep. Duncan Hunter of the 52nd Congressional District of California is still running for president. In recent weeks, the Republican congressman's presence in the campaign has all but evaporated. He was barred from appearing at the New Hampshire debate moderated by Charlie Gibson and more recently was excluded from the Fox News debate in South Carolina.

But Hunter is still running for president, even if his campaign appearances have now been reduced to opening acts for the big players still in the game.

Last night, Hunter delivered a pro-family, pro-military stump speech at what appeared—by most measures—to be a campaign rally for Mitt Romney in Taylor, Mich., near Detroit.

Romney, who had been campaigning earlier in the day in upstate Michigan, was late to arrive. The crowd was getting restless. Kids were crawling on the floor, crinkling empty bags of potato chips, and unpeeling Romney bumper stickers and slapping them across their mouths. The press platform became a makeshift jungle gym for the impatient.

The local politicians passed a few minutes showing videos of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, designed to rally the Republican faithful. The videos were simple pastiches, involving spliced video cued up to catch the candidates in a state of double talk. Clinton aroused more indignation than Obama, but the overall reaction was somewhat muted. Then the lights came back on but still no Romney. So they talked about the horrors of the tax increases passed by the state's current Democratic governor, Jennifer Granholm. They talked about taking back control of the statehouse. By this time, around 6 p.m., an hour after the rally had begun, Romney was still missing, but Hunter had conveniently entered from the back of the auditorium, along with two women holding a massive "Duncan Hunter for President 08" banner. They shuffled off to the side wall and stood quietly. A few more local politicians said some additional words. Meanwhile, on stage behind them, a nice scene was unfolding. The American flag, attached by a set of small rings to a lattice of gray poles, was carried from stage right to the center, so it stood behind two rows of otherwise empty chairs. Then the chairs were filled, mostly with healthy-looking kids of various ages. The audience, sensing something was happening, began to perk up. The event coordinator returned to the microphone and started on another introduction. Had Romney arrived?

"This is a man who decided to swim against the tide," she was saying—perhaps a reference to Romney's Mormon missionary work?—"who puts his body where his beliefs are"—a bit more cryptic?—"who went to University of California-Los Angeles"—what?—"And, of course, that man is Duncan Hunter."

Hunter got up, talked about some of the issues at stake, thanked a few people, mentioned his son's bid for Congress, and moved back to the wings. And the local politicians started talking again. Romney showed up around 7:15 p.m.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: duncan; duncanhunter; hunter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221 next last
To: Man50D
Get your sleep. We nee your help TOMORROW (your time).

It is TOMORROW already, here.

181 posted on 01/14/2008 8:25:08 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Why should RINOs ask for my vote in November when they & MSM screwed True Conservatives?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Me too!! Woohoo, go Duncan Hunter, 2008!!


182 posted on 01/14/2008 8:25:39 PM PST by debboo (Stop socialism, vote conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg; Man50D; WalterSkinner; Tennessee Nana

see post 170 and 77. Our troll is blowing more smoke than a Fiat.


183 posted on 01/14/2008 8:27:40 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Brian S. Fitzgerald
Thanks for contributing to DUNCAN HUNTER.

I made two contributions on line this month. I think the word is definitely spreading about him, as folks are fed up with the four empty suits and one nutcase, they are being told are their only *choiiiiiices".

184 posted on 01/14/2008 8:27:43 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Why should RINOs ask for my vote in November when they & MSM screwed True Conservatives?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Now that Kucinich is in, do you think they will invite DH?


185 posted on 01/14/2008 8:30:47 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg; Tennessee Nana
Well, technically if you were recently born again you are a newbie (just teasing). Welcome to the family.

Thank you. Coincidentally, back when I was a newbie in 2000, I actually challenged all of the others on here to prove to me that God was real. Back then, LONG BEFORE TENNESSEE GRANNY WAS AROUND, most of us on here were staunch libertarians and some, like me, were atheistic libertarians. Then, with the elections of 2004 (in the year 2003) came a lot of newbies who were more conservative than libertarian and a lot of Bush-can-do-no-wrong robots. Around that time, new Administrators were signed on and a lot of libertarians got banned for not supporting Bush. Somehow, I made it through, but I've become a lot more conservative than libertarian since getting saved, but I still have a very libertarian streak within me. Now, with this election, we have a lot of newbies like Tennessee Nana. But, I have NEVER gone after somebody for being a newbie or a "troll". Back in the day, NOBODY GOT BANNED for their view point; we would just argue them out until every thread was 1000+ posts long. I learned more about civics and government back then than I ever learned in school. Things have changed. I blame Bush, Dennis Hastert, Trent Lott, et al for the giant splintering of our party and some on here for dousing the flames of honest debate with Administrative water. But, we'll live on and so will the USA....hopefully.

186 posted on 01/14/2008 8:31:40 PM PST by MichiganWoodsman (A life without Christ is a life that's never fixed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: MichiganWoodsman

It really doesn’t matter how long a freeper has been here. The important thing is that they are here.


187 posted on 01/14/2008 8:39:29 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Onerom99

Thanks for bumping the Hunter thread to the top.

Naysayers do have their uses.


188 posted on 01/14/2008 8:41:22 PM PST by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
That's right. And just as we came during the 2000 election season and nobody banned us for our views (no matter how strange mine were, thus the change in name) or ridiculed us for being new (most of us at that time were new because the forum wasn't that old), I think the real newbies, especially when they are as new as Tennessee Nana, should welcome the newbies and teach them or learn from them. Have a good night.

God bless ya!

189 posted on 01/14/2008 8:43:42 PM PST by MichiganWoodsman (A life without Christ is a life that's never fixed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: All

“OT-Duncan Hunter On The Importance Of Human Life From Conception
snip

“1. Right to Life Amendment:

I would amend the U.S. Constitution and provide blanket protection to all unborn children from the moment of conception by prohibiting any state or federal law that denies the personhood of the unborn. Likewise, I have also introduced the Right to Life Act, which would legally define “personhood” as the moment of conception and, therefore, guarantee all constitutional rights and protections, including life, to the unborn without utilizing a constitutional amendment.”

http://www.renewamerica.us/forum/?date=070402&message=21


190 posted on 01/14/2008 8:43:56 PM PST by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: All

Duncan Hunter’s support of school prayer is not a recent position to pander to religious conservatives. This 1984 article proves it.

School prayer proposal pushed by Hunter in House

“SanDiego Union Tribune
March 16, 1984
Marguerite Sullivan

snip

Hunter cites Gallup polls showing that 81 percent of the American people favor a constitutional amendment allowing prayer in the schools.

“The Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution with the firm belief in a Supreme Being. I think it is ironic that we in Congress start each day with a prayer, but public school children are denied the same right,” he says.

Hunter, a second-term congressman, organized the all-night session with the backing of the Conservative Opportunity Society.

The discussion lasted from 1:20 p.m. on March 5 to 9 a.m. March 6, shattering previous records.

Hunter coordinated the event, lining up the 63 members who spoke and assigning them time slots.

The session coincided with Senate debate on the proposed constitutional amendment, which would reverse a 22-year-old Supreme Court ruling, banning organized prayer in public schools.

In the House, it was the first time in 13 years the issue had reached the floor. The Democratic leadership has bottled up the prayer proposal for years.

A House subcommittee hearing is scheduled for the end of this month but committee leaders show few signs of relenting and letting the prayer amendment reach the full House, regardless of what the Senate does.

Hunter’s efforts didn’t go unnoticed at the White House.
A few hours after the talkathon ended, Hunter received a call from President Reagan, who is the most prominent advocate of the school prayer amendment. Reagan said he had received a number of calls from supporters of the amendment, saying they had seen the House proceedings on television.”

http://newswhichcannotlose.blogspot.com/

Attention Social Conservatives: Duncan Hunter is the strongest social conservative in the race, and he always has been. No FLIP FLOPS


191 posted on 01/14/2008 8:47:34 PM PST by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: pissant

“Our troll is pretending to be a Fred fan...”

Or claim to “like Hunter”, just after spending 100 posts trashing him. If that’s a conservative, then the definition has changed since I signed up here.


192 posted on 01/14/2008 8:51:39 PM PST by RasterMaster (Rudy McRomneyson = KENNEDY wing of the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Sun

see 77 and 170 for a rebut to MENSA


193 posted on 01/14/2008 8:53:18 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster
then the definition has changed since I signed up here

the definition has changed, and aint for the better!

194 posted on 01/14/2008 8:54:48 PM PST by Battle Hymn of the Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster

Meanwhile it is pretending to like Fred, but will soon reveal its real colors.


195 posted on 01/14/2008 8:55:13 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: pissant

“see 77 and 170 for a rebut to MENSA”

Excellent! Truth and facts win every debate!


196 posted on 01/14/2008 9:03:04 PM PST by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

If he were a Hunter supporter posting that kind of garbage about Fred, his ass would have hit the bricks long ago.


197 posted on 01/14/2008 9:20:54 PM PST by WildcatClan (Vote Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
A Brokered Convention is when no candidate goes to the nominating convention with enough delegates to win the nomination. The candidates then negotiate for delegates until one gets enough for the nomination. Many times delegates are traded for a VP position.
198 posted on 01/14/2008 9:42:08 PM PST by no dems (FRED THOMPSON: The only Conservative running who can beat Hillary or Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: WildcatClan
If he were a Hunter supporter posting that kind of garbage about Fred, his ass would have hit the bricks long ago.

Yes indeed, and we all know why that hasn't happened.
199 posted on 01/14/2008 11:12:31 PM PST by mkjessup (Where's Duncan Hunter you ask? BLACKLISTED for telling the truth on the "KENNEDY WING of the GOP!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: pissant
see post 170 and 77. Our troll is blowing more smoke than a Fiat.

How to go pissant! Keep pounding the trolls with facts! It 's the bane for their FR existence.
200 posted on 01/15/2008 2:58:12 AM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! Duncan Hunter is a Cosponsor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson