Posted on 01/14/2008 4:29:25 AM PST by plan2succeed.org
TRENTON, N.J. (AP) New Jersey on Sunday became the second state to enter a compact that would eliminate the Electoral College's power to choose a president if enough states endorse the idea.
Gov. Jon S. Corzine signed legislation that approves delivering the state's 15 electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote. The Assembly approved the bill last month and the Senate followed suit earlier this month.
Maryland with 10 electoral votes had been the only state to pass the compact into law.
The measure could result in the electoral votes going to a candidate opposed by voters in New Jersey, which has backed Democratic presidential candidates since 1988.
The compact would take effect only if enough states those with a majority of votes in the Electoral College agreed to it. A candidate needs 270 of 538 electoral votes to win.
The compact has also passed both houses of the Illinois Legislature, according to the National Popular Vote movement, and has been approved by one legislative house in Arkansas, Colorado and North Carolina.
Governors in California and Hawaii, though, vetoed bills to join the compact.
The goal is to ensure that the national popular vote winner becomes president. Democrats who sponsored the bill have noted that their party's 2000 presidential nominee, Al Gore, won the popular vote but lost in the Electoral College.
Sponsors contend the agreement would ensure that all states are competitive in presidential elections and make all votes important. It also would guarantee the presidency to the person who received the most votes.
Republicans in the state criticized the bill as undermining federal elections. "This legislation is a constitutional travesty," Assemblyman Richard Merkt said. "It's a backdoor end-run of the federal Constitution."
On the Net:
* National Popular Vote: http://www.nationalpopularvote.org
New Jersey on Sunday became the second state to enter a compact that would eliminate the Electoral College's power to choose a president if enough states endorse the idea.... Maryland .. had been the only state to pass the compact into law. ... The compact has also passed both houses of the Illinois Legislature ... The compact would take effect only if enough states (blah blah blah)...
Darn, I hate having to get technical on Monday mornings.
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
Besides the above we have those little things called the 14th Amendment, Section 1, the 15th Amendment, Section 1, and about 27 Quadrillion Federal Voting Rights Laws.
'Compacts', sheesh. Talk about voter disenfranchisement. STOO-PID™ Morons
I'm sure the ACLU will be all over this just as if they had seen a Bible in a Publik Skuul.
bttt
It might be nicer if every state had a procedure to recall the governor and any state legislators that the people decided were so badly f'ing up their job that they need to be removed. Such measures in all 50 states would tremendously reduce the odds of removal via instantaneous lead poisoning.
Wait. What am I thinking? Giving the peasants any actual control over how a country is run...its so, so American. We can't have any of that around here.
We’re not a democracy, we’re a representative republic. The people of NJ will just have to decide what to do next time they have the chance. My observations of the voters in NJ lead me to believe that most are just fine with what the legislature is doing on this issue unless a Republican gets the majority of the popular national popular vote, and therefore, all of Jersey’s electors.
"Whatever California, Texas, and New York want is fine by us. I don't know nuthin' 'bout lecting no president."
One reason for the electoral college was to make it necessary for a candidate to have wide support among a large number of states, rather than concentrated support among a small number of populous states. That it was better to have a President who had 55% support in 75% of the states, than to have somebody who might have 90% support in a few states, but was so hated in the rest of the country that they would start a civil war to oppose him
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.