I really feel bad for Chuck on this one. He claims to be a strong religious man and has fallen for Huck’s BS hook, line and sinker. If Chuck really wanted to know, the Huckster’s background is all right there for him to look at. You would think that Chuck Norris, the fictional stopper of bad guys everywhere, would be really disturbed at how many violent criminals that Huck has granted clemency to. This should have stopped Chuck cold. But I think he got sucked into the “I’m a Christian conservative” thing early and and just won’t take the blinders off.
The pathetic attacks against Fred in that article are a rehash of the completely out of context MSM attacks that we have been seeing. I’m particularly disappointed that Mr. Norris repeated that distortion of Fred’s abortion stace. Yes, Fred does not support a Constitutional amendment. Neither do it as I know it won’t work. I’ve known that long before Fred started running for President. Fred DOES however want to strike down Roe vs. Wade. This would be a far more meaningful victory and is doable in the short term. That IS a conservative principle. So lets not be intellectually dishonest here.
Come on Chuck. Supporting your guy is good, but try to remain objective here. You can’t vilify the other candidates without proper reason, and if you got those talking points directly from Huck, I suggest you do some research on your own before believing every word that comes from his campaign’s office. Those comments about Fred would be suitable for the liberal MSM spin room.
“Fred DOES however want to strike down Roe vs. Wade.”
Or at least he pretends he does:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1953287/posts#27