[GovernmentIsTheProblem]

“I guess changing the subject is easier than defending the indefensible.”

How funny! I was CORRECTING wideawake on his incorrect timetable about Fred’s support of Aristide!!! Now I’m ‘changing the subject?’

The proof is in the links below.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1952012/posts?page=48#48

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1952012/posts?page=62#62

“You have not made any effort to address the issue at hand. You are using the classic Democrat defense of “everybody does it...””

Total lie. What are you, wideawake’s twin?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1952012/posts?page=10#10

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1952012/posts?page=16#16

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1952012/posts?page=48#48

[wideawake]

Now I’m ‘changing the subject?’

I would say that posting non-existent links on a topic outside of the thread is changing the subject.

I ask again:

When Ron Paul admitted in 1996 that he wrote the newsletters, was he lying?

Or was he lying in 2001 when he denied writing the newsletters?

Which was it?

You can lie more about Fred Thompson to your heart's content later - just let me know about the thread topic: was Paul lying in '96 or in '01?