?
Did Thompson at first deny that he supported Aristide against the Cedras coup, and then later admit it?
I thought he acknowledged it from the get-go.
In any case, to get back on topic, why can't Paul's campaign just give the name/names of the real authors of the newsletters?
Then there would be outside confirmation of his story and it would no longer be a question of his personal ideology, but only of his executive competence.
No, Fred said he was against the embargo and NOT for the restoration of Aristide. Some of his supporters later backtracked when shown this was a lie. Paul won’t the name the editor I suspect out of a misplaced belief (but admirable) that he screwed up by letting it be published under his name and should take the bullet himself.