Captain Kirk was able to answer the question, GITP.
He says Paul was lying in '96.
Which leads to the next issue about the authorship of Paul's newsletters.
Captain Kirk says that Paul was foolish not to out the real author of thiose newsletters.
Yet to this day, 12 years later with his credibility on the line, he has not given the names of the authors.
And that issue dovetails with the fact that much of the newsletter was written from a first person perspective using Paul's personal details.
Why was Paul taking money from people on the understanding that they were reading his personal thoughts and reflections on the news of the day, when they were actually reading someone else's?
Why was Paul running this scam on his own fans?
hey, I admited my guy lied and condemn him but applaud his apology. You won’t admit the same for your guy or call for him to apologize. Can you say double standard?